PDA

View Full Version : The True Message of Christmas


zorro
12-21-2006, 09:31 AM
"And she will bear a son, and you shall call His name Jesus; for He shall save His people from their sins." -- Matthew 1:21

This angelic proclamation to Joseph is possibly one of the most culturally incorrect statements within the Gospel birth narratives. In this one sentence, the angel sent from God delivers to Joseph a message that runs contrary to most popular Christmas messages you are likely to hear on TV, radio, and from many pulpits. It also runs contrary to the worldly understanding of the message of Christmas, and what the birth of Christ means for the world.

She Will Bear a Son

The angel informed Joseph that his betrothed was to become supernaturally pregnant. In verse 23, Matthew says that this startling revelation is a fulfillment of Isaiah's prophecy (Is. 7:14). It has never ceased to amaze me how some try to wiggle around the idea that this was, indeed, a real virgin birth. Yes, the Greek term parthenos can be used to refer to a young maiden. However, in the context of the passage, the Lord was encouraging Ahaz to ask for a sign, something remarkable that would indicate to him God's hand at work. "Ask a sign for yourself from the LORD your God; make it deep," God says to Ahaz; but Ahaz does not want to be presumptuous, so the Lord offers the sign in 7:14. If all the Lord meant was "a young maiden will become pregnant and bear a son," that hardly seems a remarkable sign. Many young maidens became pregnant. Where is the "deep sign" demonstrating an act of God?

Furthermore, this child was to be a son (huios), not a divine principle: a real, tangible, human being. But not just a mere human being. This was to be Emmanuel, "God with us." Was he just supposed to be a symbol of God's presence among His people, like the ancient Tabernacle? Not according to the gospel accounts. The angel spoke of a real child; Mary carried true flesh and blood in her womb for nine months. But this flesh and blood was more than merely a man. He was born "of a virgin" by supernatural intervention. This child was was God with us--literally. The baby that lay in the manger was fully man and fully God: God incarnate.

He Shall Save His People from Their Sins

Now the angel tells Joseph the purpose of God becoming incarnate. The child's name was to be Jesus, which is the Greek form of the Hebrew name Yeshua meaning "God saves." Who is God going to save? According to the angel, "His people." For those interested in textual variants, there is a variant at this point. The Curetonian Syriac text actually reads ton kosmon here, making the angel say that Jesus will save "the world." There are two things to note about this. First, this is the only text that says this; all other manuscripts, including the Byzantine manuscripts read ton laon autou, "His people." Second, this maverick reading in the Curetonian Syriac more than likely came about due to scribal error since the Syriac for "people" (`ama), is very similar to the Syriac word for "world". Christ did not come into the world to save every man. If He did, then you can be assured that everyone, from the most pious saint to the worst reprobate will be in Heaven when they die. Whatever God plans to do comes to pass (Psalm 33:11), so if God planned to save every person in the world, He surely would. Yet, we know He hasn't [John 6:44; Acts 13:48].

So, God is coming into the world as a man to save a particular group of people that He will call His own. But what is God going to save them from? Sickness? Famine? Disease? Oppression and poverty? Every year, we are told by the secular media that the point of Christmas is peace, and that the birth of Jesus symbolizes God's love, so we need to share that love and peace in order to end all the evils to which we are subjected every day. That's what Christmas is all about, we are told. But that is not what the angel says. The angel says that Jesus Christ came into the world with one objective in mind: to save His people from their sins. If Christ came to do anything other than this, then there is no hope for us. The evil in the world is not caused by wrong thinking, mismanagement, poverty, abuse by authority, or bad upbringing. Evil exists in the hearts of men because man is at enmity with God. Until sin is dealt with, man can never be at peace with God. And men cannot hope to have true, lasting peace with one another without first having peace with God. World peace does not begin at the UN; it begins with proclamation of the Gospel: "You shall call his name Jesus; for He will save His people from their sins."

God has made provision for the sins of men. Peace on earth is now possible, because Christ has come to reconcile God and man. God's perfect justice that demands payment for sin has been satisfied in Christ on behalf of His people.

This is the message of Matthew 1:21, and the true message of Christmas. As our world becomes increasingly secular, and the images of Christmas -- and even the word "Christmas" -- become replaced with warm feelings and empty platitudes, it becomes more important for us not to forget this. May the Lord be pleased to ignite our hearts with love and gratitude to Him for His awesome grace!

Above is from the Alpha and Omega Ministries website: http://www.aomin.org/index.php?itemid=1645

Hermione
12-21-2006, 11:07 AM
And men cannot hope to have true, lasting peace with one another without first having peace with God. World peace does not begin at the UN; it begins with proclamation of the Gospel: "You shall call his name Jesus; for He will save His people from their sins."


This will be a startling revelation to the new Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church and others of her mindset, who seem to think that the UN's Millennium Development Goals and the notion of reconciliation means "play nice" comprise the gospel.

zorro
12-22-2006, 12:18 PM
Hermione,

I think that you will find an article titled "The liberal (Episcopal) Church in meltdown" quite interesting. It is found on the Virtue Online website, which is The Voice of Global Orthodox Anglicanism and it is located here: http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=5203

Hermione
12-22-2006, 01:06 PM
Please don't direct people to Virtue Online. A much more responsible site is TitusOneNine, or even StandFirminFaith.

zorro
12-22-2006, 01:49 PM
Thanks for the reference to the other websites.

I myself am really not Anglican or Episcopalian, but I have an Episcopal friend in Jackson who has been quite concerned for many years about the direction of the Episcopal church. I actually just came across the Virtue Online website today and I thought that the article to which I referred was interesting. For example, here is a noteworthy excerpt:

Like other mainline Protestant groups in America - Methodists, Presbyterians, Lutherans, and the like - the Episcopal Church decided some 40 years ago that the future of Christianity lay in accommodating its theology and moral teachings to whatever was fashionable or politically correct in the secular culture. Militant feminism and blessings for gay sex were only part of the doctrinal upheaval. Avant-garde clerics and theologians throughout North America and Western Europe scoffed at the traditional Christian teachings that Jesus Christ had been born of a virgin, worked miracles, died for human sin, rose from the dead, and founded a church that was supposed to be the means of salvation.

All those liberal strands of Christianity are paying the price for their devil's bargain with secularism in vastly diminished numbers, as members figure out that when a religion lets them do whatever they want, one of the things they don't want to do is go to church on Sunday. The mainline denominations, which once represented 40% of US Protestants, now represent only 12%: 17 million out of 135 million.

To put it bluntly, liberal Christianity is in meltdown. The election of Jefferts Schori, a theological liberal who prayed to a female Jesus at last summer's bishops' convention, together with the bishops' vote not to endorse the bedrock Christian proposition that Jesus is Lord, proved to be the last straw for many Episcopalians who believe that the essence of their Anglican faith isn't "tension" but fidelity to the Bible and the Christian creeds.

Hermione
12-22-2006, 03:12 PM
This is exactly what's wrong with Virtue -- people were genuinely unhappy with J-S's comments about "our mother Jesus" and more unhappy with many of her subsequent comments. However, it's not accurate that she "prayed to a female Jesus." We on the "orthodox" side are badly outnumbered and sometimes out maneuvered. We have to be as truthful and accurate as possible; we can't afford to give our opponents the weapon of our own careless errors. Do look at T19, I think it's more your speed. Totally orthodox (the blog is maintained by Canon Kendall Harmon, a noted theologian) and includes a range of news beyond the Episcopal church.

zorro
12-22-2006, 04:30 PM
Interestingly, the same exact article is found on TitusOneNine!

http://titusonenine.classicalanglican.net/index.php?paged=3

Conveyor Belt
12-22-2006, 07:08 PM
I think the true meaning of Christmas can be found in the presents you get.

zorro
12-22-2006, 08:55 PM
I think the true meaning of Christmas can be found in the presents you get.
You must be referring to the topic of the present that one of your favorite fellow MHers had specially delivered to you this week. :)

Hermione
12-22-2006, 10:20 PM
Interestingly, the same exact article is found on TitusOneNine!

http://titusonenine.classicalanglican.net/index.php?paged=3

I see -- they both picked it up from the same source. Terry Mattingly is popular, so that's not a surprise. Lots of blog overlap. Thanks by the way, you pushed me to actually read the piece.

zorro
12-22-2006, 11:41 PM
I see -- they both picked it up from the same source. Terry Mattingly is popular, so that's not a surprise. Lots of blog overlap. Thanks by the way, you pushed me to actually read the piece.
Actually, you might have read the wrong article. When you click on that link in my last post, you need to scroll down to the article that was written by Charlotte Allen (this is the article which I first mentioned). The Terry Mattingly article isn't the one.

Hermione
12-22-2006, 11:52 PM
I need to go to bed, my confusion level is too high. I read the Allen piece on StandFirm. As I said, there's a lot of overlap. Thanks again.