PDA

View Full Version : Plot to control talk radio.

gonefishin
06-22-2007, 11:16 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285933,00.html

This is interesting yet not very surprising.
daisy
06-22-2007, 11:26 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285933,00.html

This is interesting yet not very surprising.


I am not for doing that if it is paid for by sponsors and is on the radio, fine. If I am against hearing it I change the channel. Choice.

On the other hand, when I am in the car with my boyfriend and hear Sean Hannity, I wish they would ban his squeaky voice. Grates on me. That is personal choice.
Bluesman
06-22-2007, 11:50 AM
That squeekiness in his voice. That is just the pain of the truth he is speaking (most of the time). Dr. Levin or ever how you spell it that is sometimes a guest on the show... now that sucka has a whiny/squeeky voice fo sho.
daisy
06-22-2007, 12:06 PM
That squeekiness in his voice. That is just the pain of the truth he is speaking (most of the time). Dr. Levin or ever how you spell it that is sometimes a guest on the show... now that sucka has a whiny/squeeky voice fo sho.

I am not talking about the content. Just give me Bruce Williams and his voice anyday. Also his humble, helpful manner.

I was not disputing the content or truth of Hannity just the frequency of his voice. :smt022
cubby 1
06-22-2007, 07:43 PM
Hannity predicted this long ago.
Astra
06-22-2007, 09:25 PM
A conversation that may or may not have actually happened is considered "news" now?

Wake me up when someone actually proposes legislation. They'd have to be crazy to do so, it would be a First Amendment nightmare.
dollfus46
06-23-2007, 03:05 PM
A conversation that may or may not have actually happened is considered "news" now?

Wake me up when someone actually proposes legislation. They'd have to be crazy to do so, it would be a First Amendment nightmare.

Well, now we hear that the supposed conversation took place three years ago. As for it's validity, I tend to believe Inhoff over Clinton and Boxer. We'll never know, so much ado about nada. Something about the Freedom Act. Not Freedom of Info Act. I'm not a Shaun Hannity fan, and I hate Hanity and Colmes. However, Hannity's America is pretty good, I think. But, then, I'm an admitted radical right wing loon. :-D
dollfus46
06-23-2007, 03:11 PM
I think this ties into the Trent Lott post. He also said something to the effect that "we have to do something about talk radio." this led to bringing up the freedom act and Inhoff's remark. I think. I could be mistaken..........UH GIN!
Guru
06-23-2007, 09:19 PM
I am not for doing that if it is paid for by sponsors and is on the radio, fine. If I am against hearing it I change the channel. Choice.

On the other hand, when I am in the car with my boyfriend and hear Sean Hannity, I wish they would ban his squeaky voice. Grates on me. That is personal choice.

* What if you are not with your boyfriend and hear Sean Hannity?