View Full Version : Schools Want More Money
WE JUST GOT ANOTHER REQUEST FOR MONEY. THIS TIME IT IS SCHOOL PICTURES. NOT ONE PACKAGE WITH AN 8 x 10 IS LESS THAN $25. MONEY MONEY MONEY...RAISE MONEY, BRING MONEY, SPEND MONEY, WE NEED MONEY IT IS ALL WE HAVE HEARD SINCE AUGUST!!!! EDUCATION IS PRICELESS BUT COME ON. SOME OF US DON'T HAVE A LOT OF MONEY TO GIVE THE SCHOOLS THAT IS WHY OUR CHILDREN GO TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL. :smt102
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 08:39 PM
Um, then don't buy a package.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 08:40 PM
SOME OF US DON'T HAVE A LOT OF MONEY TO GIVE THE SCHOOLS THAT IS WHY OUR CHILDREN GO TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL. :smt102
Not true. I know plenty of people who could afford to give their children a private education, but find greater value in the public schools.
fuzzis
10-02-2007, 08:41 PM
Or maybe consider doing some research about where those funds actually go. :smt105 Before you SCREAM at us in ALL CAPS about *schools* wanting more money.
Bahlk
10-02-2007, 08:42 PM
What grade? I'm assuming lower elementary. Just wait until highschool...rings, prom dresses, yearbooks, cars...I could go on and on but i'll probably get dizzy
Bahlk
10-02-2007, 08:44 PM
And these that I said before aren't mandated by the schools just for the extras that make for a high school memories.
Wowee! Sorry folks. Guess I'm alone in my boat. : ( Somiss- gotta have a class picture...this is a have to...fuzzis-sorry about the caps...it's just what the computer was set on. Really I wasn't screaming. Thanks!
SoMiss, I see your responses to a lot of posts on here are very negative. What gives?
Or maybe consider doing some research about where those funds actually go. :smt105 Before you SCREAM at us in ALL CAPS about *schools* wanting more money.
It doesn't matter where the funds go, that's not the point. The point is we are running out of money to give!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 08:51 PM
Somiss- gotta have a class picture...this is a have to.
Well, I'm not sure what to tell you. Nothing is free; the guy who takes the pictures has to make a living, too.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 08:51 PM
SoMiss, I see your responses to a lot of posts on here are very negative. What gives?
I'm not negative, I'm a realist. Most of my posts are well-received.
Well, I'm not sure what to tell you. Nothing is free; the guy who takes the pictures has to make a living, too.
But does the school have to take a cut of it too?
I don't know that your school does, but ours does.
I'm not negative, I'm a realist. Most of my posts are well-received.
You've been groaned at 286 times in 179 posts.
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 08:55 PM
I'm not negative, I'm a realist. Most of my posts are well-received.
:bowrofl::bowrofl::bowrofl::bowrofl::bowrofl::bowr ofl::bowrofl::bowrofl::bowrofl::kekeke::kekeke::sm t023
:smt102:bs::bs:I am so sorry somisstv, I couldn't help myself!
But does the school have to take a cut of it too?
I don't know that your school does, but ours does.
Yes, and I quote:
"This is a fund raiser for your school. A portion of sales is rebated to your school."
fuzzis
10-02-2007, 08:57 PM
It doesn't matter where the funds go, that's not the point. The point is we are running out of money to give!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It is the point when you say that the *schools* want more money.
Somiss- gotta have a class picture...this is a have to...
You don't have to purchase a class picture. If it's going in the yearbook, then the school will have that picture regardless of whether you buy it or not...if your child shows up to have their picture taken.
Bahlk
10-02-2007, 08:57 PM
You've been groaned at 286 times in 179 posts.
SoMiss has his Haters. LOL
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 08:59 PM
You've been groaned at 286 times in 179 posts.
Yup. Most of those groans were from fools.
Scarlett O'Hara
10-02-2007, 08:59 PM
A portion of the picture costs does go back to the school for purchases they choose such as computers,etc. At our school, I'm not sure at others, every child has a picture taken for the yearbook and school ID which is free. The parents have the option to buy packages that they would like to have. I can see where you feel schools always have their hands out but the funds are used to benefit the kids with equipment they may not have otherwise been acquired.
Bahlk
10-02-2007, 09:02 PM
I don't think schools are in the business for profit. Alot of the extra (if you can call it that) is for computers and other stuff for the classroom. I know for a fact because my mother is a teacher that sometimes the teachers have to purchase some things for their classroom because the school won't. If there were teachers that wouldn't spend a dime of their own money, then the school experience would be totally different from what it is
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:05 PM
What's being lost here is that the school isn't taking the pictures; a company is. This company has to pay for film, equipment, personnel, transportation, developing, and printing costs. There's a decent amount of overhead, and the photographer is just trying to make a living. Getting school photos is an optional expense. We don't complain that the school makes us pay for popcorn at the Friday night football game; why should we complain now?
Im not saying the schools don't need the money. Lord, I know they do. It just seems like they've always got their hand out. I know I do not have to buy the pictures, but let's be real, I want a picture of my children at school. It just seems the prices for the pictures are a little high. At the beginning of the school year we paid all this money for fees, field trips etc. for the whole year. Now they have planned an extra field trip that is going to cost more money. Yes, I know I do not have to let my child go, but I'm not going to make him not go when all his classmates are going. If you disagree with me I understand, but please let me vent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:07 PM
I know I do not have to buy the pictures, but let's be real, I want a picture of my children at school. It just seems the prices for the pictures are a little high.
The prices are set at what the market will bear. If you intend to buy the photos at the current price, then the price is set correctly.
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 09:09 PM
Yup. Most of those groans were from fools.
So were mine, somisstv!
:laugh:
fuzzis
10-02-2007, 09:10 PM
Im not saying the schools don't need the money. Lord, I know they do. It just seems like they've always got their hand out. I know I do not have to buy the pictures, but let's be real, I want a picture of my children at school. It just seems the prices for the pictures are a little high. At the beginning of the school year we paid all this money for fees, field trips etc. for the whole year. Now they have planned an extra field trip that is going to cost more money. Yes, I know I do not have to let my child go, but I'm not going to make him not go when all his classmates are going. If you disagree with me I understand, but please let me vent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Perhaps if you were a bit more *accurate* in your vent, it would be one thing.
Is it expensive to send your child to school? Yes. I'm not exactly sure why that is, and somewhere along the line it got to be a bit ridiculous. But to be here bitching about the *schools* when you're using as your tipping point an OPTIONAL service, you make yourself appear...slightly uninformed.
Vent by all means. But vent about the right thing.
noway
10-02-2007, 09:16 PM
I agree with you r13...
Perhaps if you were a bit more *accurate* in your vent, it would be one thing.
Is it expensive to send your child to school? Yes. I'm not exactly sure why that is, and somewhere along the line it got to be a bit ridiculous. But to be here bitching about the *schools* when you're using as your tipping point an OPTIONAL service, you make yourself appear...slightly uninformed.
Vent by all means. But vent about the right thing.
First of all, it seems like you have been trying to push my buttons since we've started.
Second, I have already said I know where the money goes, I AM JUST RUNNING OUT OF MONEY TO GIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last time I'm going to say it.
I understand r13's vent. It seems like every time you turn around, someone somewhere is asking for money, whether it's Junior needing $5 for a field trip or Little Missy needing $10 for a t-shirt. Everybody wants school pictures. They're a staple of childhood memories. I just paid $42 for my daughter's. Now if this had been back when I had three boys in school at once, instead of $42, it would have been $126. For pictures. I have no problem with schools having fundraisers and kids having to take money off and on for different activities, but I think the school pictures should be what the photographer charges without an added amount to the school as a fundraiser. I would hate to think that people would have to pass on buying them because of the jacked-up price. There are plenty of other opportunities for fundraisers.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:23 PM
I AM JUST RUNNING OUT OF MONEY TO GIVE!
Then don't give it.
countrygirl
10-02-2007, 09:23 PM
Yup. Most of those groans were from fools.
:smt102 I guess I must be a fool, in your eyes at least. I'm a happy fool anyhow....Just quit sweating the small stuff! If you don't want to spend money on the pictures, don't buy them. Go to Sears or Pennys or Olan Mills. Or don't go anywhere. Take your own. You don't HAVE to sell stuff, and you don't HAVE to buy stuff. Classrings, annuals, and most things are extras. If you don't want the extras for your child, don't buy them, but don't complain because they are not free.
By the way, school pictures are not usually very good anyhow....
Then don't give it.
You're missing the point.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:25 PM
You're missing the point.
I don't think I am. There is someone complaining that things cost money, and that they're tired of paying money to get things. Yet, they can't live without these things, and wish that it wasn't so expensive. However, they will find the money to pay for it, so it must not be too expensive.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:26 PM
:smt102 I guess I must be a fool, in your eyes at least. I'm a happy fool anyhow.
I never said that. Why do you assume that I think you are a fool?
Apperantly I am having trouble getting my point across. I don't want my child to miss out on all these things. With bills already tearing me a new one, it's hard to give as much as I'd like to.
I don't think I am. There is someone complaining that things cost money, and that they're tired of paying money to get things. Yet, they can't live without these things, and wish that it wasn't so expensive. However, they will find the money to pay for it, so it must not be too expensive.
Just because we "find money to pay for it" doesn't mean it's not too expensive. I remember a few years ago some bills didn't get paid so the kids could have a good christmas.
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 09:32 PM
R13, I understand your point! It seems that all of the things we have to buy have skyrocketed in price. Add to what you MUST buy, the things you really would like to buy, and you are looking at one big bill!
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:32 PM
Just because we "find money to pay for it" doesn't mean it's not too expensive. I remember a few years ago some bills didn't get paid so the kids could have a good christmas.
If it was too expensive, I would consider it to be cost-prohibitive. It is not cost-prohibitive in your case, as you have stated you have the money to pay for it.
As for your child's Christmas, I would never presume to tell you how to run your finances.
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 09:33 PM
I don't think I am. There is someone complaining that things cost money, and that they're tired of paying money to get things. Yet, they can't live without these things, and wish that it wasn't so expensive. However, they will find the money to pay for it, so it must not be too expensive.
How many children do you have Somisstv?
As for your child's Christmas, I would never presume to tell you how to run your finances.
Everyone has their priorities, mine are with my children.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:37 PM
How many children do you have Somisstv?
I have no children. If you are implying that I do not understand the argument because I do not have children, that would be a fallacious argument to make. I have a family and financial commitments, and the lack of children in the household doesn't mean that I am incapable of maintaining a budget or prioritizing my spending habits.
I have no children. .
Then why are you even in this conversation. No wonder it has been so hard to get my point across.
Honey
10-02-2007, 09:42 PM
I feel your pain. Sure it is easy to say, "Well don't buy it or don't sale it" but if it's your little child being left out then it does hurt deep inside. How could I not want my child to go on the special field trip if they sold the christmas wrapping paper. I just couldn't picture my little one sitting in the classroom all by themselves while the others were on the trip to Burketts. I strugled thru school and many times the extras were impossible so I learned to pick what was more important. You know, do I want lunch or that candy bar that the beta club is selling? I have found with my own kids that they didn't want all the extras. Neither one of them wanted the class rings or the fancy graduation packets. Or for their friends either. Now in defence to the teachers I know they are pressed with the limited amount of money given to them for special things for their rooms. I think that is where volunteers and donated stuff can be a big help. So I feel your pain and I have ears for listening. We all need to vent without ridicule and today happens to be r13 turn. Tomorrow may be SoMissTv or Fuzzis or jmb. So go ahead r13. I'm listening.
countrygirl
10-02-2007, 09:46 PM
Sorry, SoMissTV. I groaned you and you said that most folks that groaned you were fools. You hit a nerve. I remember standing on my front porch wondering if I would have to sell my paid for house to fund the emergency airlift and later surgeries that would save my eldest grandchild's life. I would have done it in a heartbeat if necessary. No I didn't have to sell the house and my grandchild is now 9 years old and one of the lights of my life. I just kinda get upset at people that complain about SMALL stuff that they do not have to have. Simply do not have school pictures made if you cannot afford them. It will not kill your child!
fuzzis
10-02-2007, 09:46 PM
The whole do-you-have-children statement really irks me. Dan Porter had two beautiful children. He killed them to spite his ex-wife. Britney Spears has two children that she could give a damn less about. Being a parent doesn't mean that you're an expert on what it means to have children or all things associated with children.
By all means put your children first...but you should know that putting your children first doesn't mean giving them *stuff*...because the stuff, even the school pictures, fades and becomes insignificant. They'll remember the lessons you teach them and the love you give...which doesn't really have a whole lot to do with *stuff*.
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 09:47 PM
I have no children. If you are implying that I do not understand the argument because I do not have children, that would be a fallacious argument to make. I have a family and financial commitments, and the lack of children in the household doesn't mean that I am incapable of maintaining a budget or prioritizing my spending habits.
Maybe-
But it does make you incapable of truly knowing how it feels to not be able to (or to make the choice not to )give your children everything they need and some things they just want.
noway
10-02-2007, 09:47 PM
R13 start smoking in this thread and it will clear out.. :smt102
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:50 PM
Then why are you even in this conversation.
Because one doesn't have to have children in order to discuss financial priorities and market rates.
Besides, suggesting that having children opens up a new world of understanding otherwise unattainable is akin to saying that one cannot appreciate music without being a musician, or one cannot officiate football without having played football. Sure, it helps, but is not required for an essential understanding. Will I want class photos of my child one day? Yes. Will I sacrifice a car note or mortgage note in order to purchase them? No. I know when photos are taken; I know approximately how much they cost; I know to save for them ahead of time. Are they too expensive? If I believe they are, I won't pay for them. That's what, "too expensive" means.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:53 PM
But it does make you incapable of truly knowing how it feels to not be able to (or to make the choice not to )give your children everything they need and some things they just want.
Seeing as how I have no children, it is difficult to provide for them in any case. :)
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:56 PM
she's talking about the multitude of scams that come our way these days.
You're saying school photos are a scam? As a small-businessman, I would think that you could appreciate the intricacies of market value and pricing.
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 09:56 PM
The whole do-you-have-children statement really irks me. Dan Porter had two beautiful children. He killed them to spite his ex-wife. Britney Spears has two children that she could give a damn less about. Being a parent doesn't mean that you're an expert on what it means to have children or all things associated with children.
By all means put your children first...but you should know that putting your children first doesn't mean giving them *stuff*...because the stuff, even the school pictures, fades and becomes insignificant. They'll remember the lessons you teach them and the love you give...which doesn't really have a whole lot to do with *stuff*.
I think most might have assumed I was referring to caring, loving families that have to make a choice between have to have and want to have.
Somisstv was rude and less than empathetic with R13 because it seems he nay have failed to empathise with R13's position. Perhaps that is because he doesn't have children.
Don't know where the Dan Porter and Brittney reference came from- kinda seems like rhetoric to me.
Just saying...
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:58 PM
Sorry, SoMissTV. I groaned you and you said that most folks that groaned you were fools.
I didn't say, "all", though. I left myself a way out. :)
I remember standing on my front porch wondering if I would have to sell my paid for house to fund the emergency airlift and later surgeries that would save my eldest grandchild's life.
The health of a child takes precedence, no questions asked.
I just kinda get upset at people that complain about SMALL stuff that they do not have to have. Simply do not have school pictures made if you cannot afford them. It will not kill your child!
precisely. You can't buy your child's love.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 09:59 PM
Somisstv was rude and less than empathetic with R13 because it seems he nay have failed to empathise with R13's position. Perhaps that is because he doesn't have children.
I was not rude. I said that photos are optional, and not required to the education process. If they are too expensive, then don't buy them.
precisely. You can't buy your child's love.
It has nothing to do with "buying their love". It has to do with the child not being able to participate with the other children, i.e. sitting in a classroom by himself while the other kids go on a field trip, because mommy and daddy can't afford to buy whatever the school sends home.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:03 PM
I think this is an excellent opportunity for parents to give their child a valuable lesson or two on free-enterprize, marketing scams, guilt trips, values, corruption, and other bullshit, in general.
I would agree. If they are "too expensive", don't buy them and use it as a learning opportunity.
idrivearangeroversmilin
10-02-2007, 10:03 PM
Tsk Tsk are we all being respectful to the members of the forum? That is one of the rules you know SoMissTV and Fuzzis-by the way fuzzis-you smokin something cuz you are out there gurlfriend. I'm with you r13. thumbs up. :smt023
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:03 PM
It has nothing to do with "buying their love". It has to do with the child not being able to participate with the other children, i.e. sitting in a classroom by himself while the other kids go on a field trip, because mommy and daddy can't afford to buy whatever the school sends home.
That has absolutely nothing to do with school photos, which is what I'm talking about.
That has absolutely nothing to do with school photos, which is what I'm talking about.
where have you been this whole thread??????:smt102
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:10 PM
where have you been this whole thread??????:smt102
What do you mean? You started this thread by complaining that school photos are too expensive, and the school should do something about it. I said that if they were too expensive, then don't buy them. If enough parents take this same route, then the photo company has to come up with an alternate pricing strategy. Somehow you're now telling me about children staying home on field trips because they didn't sell wrapping paper, which is a completely different argument. There is no reward incentive for the child if their parents buy photos, is there?
countrygirl
10-02-2007, 10:12 PM
I think every child CAN and SHOULD learn that there are things that they CAN and CANNOT do, and things that they CAN and CANNOT have. For whatever reason. The eldest grandchild cannot participate in some sports....and has not been invited to certain events because of this. We can either sit around crying about it, or encourage the child in the avenues in which he/she can succeed. I think this occurs with ALL children, whether they are handicapped or not.
What do you mean? You started this thread by complaining that school photos are too expensive, and the school should do something about it. I said that if they were too expensive, then don't buy them. If enough parents take this same route, then the photo company has to come up with an alternate pricing strategy. Somehow you're now telling me about children staying home on field trips because they didn't sell wrapping paper, which is a completely different argument. There is no reward incentive for the child if their parents buy photos, is there?
One of the reasons they are too expensive is because the prices are jacked up for the school to take a cut.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:13 PM
No d*******, read the whole paragraph.
I see that you've now devolved into personal attacks and vulgar language. Our new member, "I Drive A Ranger Over Smilin", is probably disappointed in you. I know I am; I thought you would have a substantial contribution to make on this thread. I can see now that you've run out of ammo.
idrivearangeroversmilin
10-02-2007, 10:13 PM
Then why are you even in this conversation. No wonder it has been so hard to get my point across.
i'm with you R13...:smt023
WE JUST GOT ANOTHER REQUEST FOR MONEY. THIS TIME IT IS SCHOOL PICTURES. NOT ONE PACKAGE WITH AN 8 x 10 IS LESS THAN $25. MONEY MONEY MONEY...RAISE MONEY, BRING MONEY, SPEND MONEY, WE NEED MONEY IT IS ALL WE HAVE HEARD SINCE AUGUST!!!! EDUCATION IS PRICELESS BUT COME ON. SOME OF US DON'T HAVE A LOT OF MONEY TO GIVE THE SCHOOLS THAT IS WHY OUR CHILDREN GO TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL. :smt102
Yes, Somiss, I did start this thread about school pictures. But if you will take time to read the whole statement, you will see that I also say something about them always wanting money. thanks.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:14 PM
One of the reasons they are too expensive is because the prices are jacked up for the school to take a cut.
Then tell the school that you refuse to buy the photos for that reason. If enough parents join you in refusing to purchase photos, the school will rethink the policy. If parents just continue to pay the rate without complaint to the school officials, they will not change their ways.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:16 PM
But if you will take time to read the whole statement, you will see that I also say something about them always wanting money. thanks.
I know. I have not addressed that portion of your post with any of my responses. Trying to use the wrapping paper argument with school photos is apples to oranges.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:16 PM
Oh yeah, and you're tag-teaming, too. Just who wears the dress on that team, hmmmm? :laugh:
You're now quoting yourself and commenting on your own comments. Hubbarrister would be proud.
idrivearangeroversmilin
10-02-2007, 10:19 PM
Oh yeah, and you're tag-teaming, too. Just who wears the dress on that team, hmmmm? :laugh:
YOU ARE WAY COOL HAWKEYE!!!
No, it's "I drive a range rover". :smt118
:bowrofl::laugh:
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:22 PM
d******. :smt118
And you are claiming that we have lost decorum? That's pretty hypocritical. It seems to me that you might be an alias. Hopefully, a mod will take a look.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:25 PM
jmb, can you explain why you groaned me? What part of my response did you disagree with?
idrivearangeroversmilin
10-02-2007, 10:27 PM
And you are claiming that we have lost decorum? That's pretty hypocritical. It seems to me that you might be an alias. Hopefully, a mod will take a look.
SORRY, I COULDN'T HELP IT. YOU WERE STIRRING THE POT, I FIGURED I'D JUMP IN. :smt009 AND IT'S KINDA FUN! :clap: I DO HOPE YOU HAVE A LOVELY NIGHT ANYWAY LOVE YA!
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 10:29 PM
And, once again and again, I am rolling up my pants leg!
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:32 PM
I am rolling up my pants leg!
You taking a pee break?
BlueDogDemocrat
10-02-2007, 10:33 PM
Well, I agree, school pictures should not be a place to fundraise. It should be completely optional, and well, if you are a parent, you know school photos aren't really optional...well that is unless you are my mom. I have several school photos where I have "proof" written across my face.
EricStratton
10-02-2007, 10:36 PM
What I really hate is when these damn local businesses don't pay-up on their Boosterthon pledges?
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 10:43 PM
You taking a pee break?
Yeah- I thought i might need to show you how- A**hole.
If I didn't know you, I would swear you were 12 years old.
SoMissTV
10-02-2007, 10:44 PM
Yeah- I thought i might need to show you how- A**hole.
Lighten up.
idrivearangeroversmilin
10-02-2007, 10:45 PM
Careful Flower, Somiss Is Watching The Verbage Tonight Take My Word For It.
Kitty
10-02-2007, 10:47 PM
This thread is getting rather mean-spirited. :(
EricStratton
10-02-2007, 10:47 PM
Careful Flower, Somiss Is Watching The Verbage Tonight Take My Word For It.
http://www.endemol.co.za/UploadedImages/SNITCH%20LOGO(2).jpg
countrygirl
10-02-2007, 10:48 PM
School pictures ARE OPTIONAL! I retired as a teacher a few years ago, but when I taught, there were a number of kids that did not buy the photos. There was no big deal about it....No one made fun of anybody...the teachers would not allow it...Some kids had 2 pics made or bought 2 packages..whatever. The pictures are taken so quickly that the kids really don't notice anything. It's really not a big deal. I'm just wondering why so many folks are getting their "panties in a wad" over nothing.
idrivearangeroversmilin
10-02-2007, 10:49 PM
Lighten up.
SO MISS, "LIGHTEN UP" YOU NEED TO TAKE HEED TO YOUR OWN ADVICE. CUZ YOU BEEN PRETTY HEAVY ON HERE TONIGHT DUDE. AND, YOU BEEN WRECKING MY REPUTATION!!!! BUT,
EricStratton
10-02-2007, 10:55 PM
Y'all take it easy on SoMiss.....he's recovering from vaginal rejuvenation!
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 10:57 PM
All in the good spirit of pointless rhetoric.
Somisstv and I go back a long way- he'll be alright.
And I need to slow down- Ia m racking up on the groans tonight!
BlueDogDemocrat
10-02-2007, 10:58 PM
I love SoMissTV as much as he loves his little groan button.
idrivearangeroversmilin
10-02-2007, 10:58 PM
K...
countrygirl
10-02-2007, 11:04 PM
Hey, I must be pretty nice...I just noticed that I don't have any groans. I've groaned a few folks though.
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 11:04 PM
Oh godamighty, you hit'em on the nose dat time :lolsign: I tried to rep you guut on dat but I shoot'n blanks after this frackus.
I think that is the best I have ever seen ES! All is well in my little world tonight!
Hey, I must be pretty nice...I just noticed that I don't have any groans. I've groaned a few folks though.
There ya go! You'll never forget your first.
Jurist
10-02-2007, 11:13 PM
This thread is currently being moderated. 2 Alias' have been noted and discussions will be had as to appropriate action to be taken. For those who are currently posting under those alias' in this thread - take note of the Wiki Rules. You are currently violating same.
Thanks.
EricStratton
10-02-2007, 11:14 PM
This thread is currently being moderated. 2 Alias' have been noted and discussions will be had as to appropriate action to be taken. For those who are currently posting under those alias' in this thread - take note of the Wiki Rules. You are currently violating same.
Thanks.
Boo! Go away!
Kitty
10-02-2007, 11:15 PM
:grouphug:
Jurist
10-02-2007, 11:15 PM
Boo! Go away!
Sorry. I got invited to the party.
BlueDogDemocrat
10-02-2007, 11:17 PM
big brother watches... dum dum dum....
Jurist
10-02-2007, 11:17 PM
I do love those usernames you materaters choose. At least give us a hint as to who the perpatraitors are? Please, please?
Shame. You know better.
EricStratton
10-02-2007, 11:17 PM
Sorry. I got invited to the party.
Don't we have a system in place to get rid of "undesirables"?
BlueDogDemocrat
10-02-2007, 11:19 PM
yeah, if you know someone is using an alias, why don't you ban both of them?
DeanWormer
10-02-2007, 11:19 PM
You keep your mouth shut, old man!
BlueDogDemocrat
10-02-2007, 11:21 PM
Who you talking to, buster?
Sister Golden Hair
10-02-2007, 11:27 PM
Where'd Somisstv go????????
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.