PDA

View Full Version : Judge: FBI made a 'deal with the devil'


virgo
11-02-2007, 11:20 AM
Interesting (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071102/ap_on_re_us/mob_fbi_agent).


The Associated Press

NEW YORK - A former FBI agent accused of conspiring in a mob murder spree has been cleared of the sensational charges, but the vaunted law enforcement agency received a scathing rebuke from a judge in the process.

In a four-page decision that brought the trial of ex-agent Lindley DeVecchio to a stunning end Thursday, state Supreme Court Justice Gustin Reichbach said the FBI violated its own rules by allowing DeVecchio to court a known killer as an informant for well over a decade.

"In the face of the obvious menace posed by organized crime, the FBI was willing ... to make a deal with the devil," Reichbach said in a hushed Brooklyn courtroom. "At best, the FBI engaged in a policy of self-deception, not wanting to know the true facts about this informant-murderer whom they chose to employ."

The judge also referred to testimony by Linda Schiro, informant Gregory Scarpa's longtime girlfriend, that Scarpa had assisted the FBI in finding the bodies of slain civil rights workers in Mississippi. In 1964, she said, Scarpa shoved a gun into the mouth of a Mississippi Klansman — a threat that persuaded the man to reveal where the trio's bodies were buried.

"That a thug like Scarpa would be employed by the federal government to beat witnesses and threaten them at gunpoint to obtain information ... is a shocking demonstration of the government's unacceptable willingness to employ criminality to fight crime," the judge said.

Guru
11-02-2007, 11:27 AM
Sounds bad but one startling point is that even if he did hold a gun on the hostage, the information that he got was real and there was no confusion as to the validity of that. Don't want to open a can of worms with this statement but I think sometimes the extremes justify the means.
The flip side of that coin is all the criminals that go free while everyone else is btching about it knowing all along that they committed a crime.
So, what to do?

fuzzis
11-02-2007, 11:32 AM
The ends don't justify the means. You can't hold yourself up as a defender of rights and the law when you cast those very things aside because they're inconvenient or not expedient. You can't expect people to trust the police to protect them if the police or their proxies are as dirty those they need protection from.

Fish-Bait
11-02-2007, 11:36 AM
He didn't shoot him.....:-D

Guru
11-02-2007, 11:55 AM
The ends don't justify the means. You can't hold yourself up as a defender of rights and the law when you cast those very things aside because they're inconvenient or not expedient. You can't expect people to trust the police to protect them if the police or their proxies are as dirty those they need protection from.

* Oh I can certainly see your point. The other side of that is it's not always a perfect world. Not to be demeaning with that statement, just saying. It's not like you are going to walk up to someone guilty and they are going to spill the beans cause you are a nice police officer and it's the right thing to do to clear your conscience.