PDA

View Full Version : Blog Takes Failed Marriage into First Amendment Territory


fuzzis
01-10-2008, 11:14 AM
Blog Takes Failed Marriage Into Fight Over Free Speech (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/us/10divorce.html?_r=1&oref=slogin)

...The husband, William Krasnansky, posted what he calls a fictionalized account of the marriage on his blog late last year. His wife, Maria Garrido, complained to the judge overseeing their divorce, who ordered Mr. Krasnansky to take down “any and all Internet postings” about his wife and their marriage pending a hearing next month.

Mr. Krasnansky, 51, says the order amounts to a prior restraint, a rare restriction of speech before publication, and a violation of his constitutional right to free speech. His lawyer, Debra R. Schoenberg of Burlington, Vt., has asked Judge Thomas Devine of Washington County Family Court to vacate the order and dismiss Ms. Garrido’s motion for immediate relief.

The order has surprised some experts in First Amendment law, who say it constitutes a prior restraint and appears too broad to be constitutional, especially since no hearing or trial has been held....

dollfus46
01-10-2008, 01:16 PM
Blog Takes Failed Marriage Into Fight Over Free Speech (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/us/10divorce.html?_r=1&oref=slogin)
:cry: Life is just getting waaaaay to complicated for me. Time to go find a small island to live on. No phone, no tv. Just a 5 star restaurant, one greasy spoon cafe, and one helluva library.:kekeke:

mybabysmomma
01-10-2008, 02:05 PM
:cry: Life is just getting waaaaay to complicated for me. Time to go find a small island to live on. No phone, no tv. Just a 5 star restaurant, one greasy spoon cafe, and one helluva library.:kekeke:
Would you mind renting me a section of sand for my grass hut? Thanks! :laugh:

58ford
01-10-2008, 02:35 PM
Neoluddites unite!!

dollfus46
01-10-2008, 06:54 PM
Would you mind renting me a section of sand for my grass hut? Thanks! :laugh:

No. everything's free on my island. Climb aboard.:clap:

dollfus46
01-10-2008, 06:58 PM
Heh heh heh. Hendrixfreak70, first time you or anybody brings up a controversial subject you get stuffed in the bottle with the note and set afloat. No need to discuss politics nor evolution on my island. We read, we eat, we swap recipes, watch for shooting stars. Only decisions you'll have to make is, do I want a greasy hamburger w/fries or rack of lamb for supper?:kekeke:

SueScribe
01-10-2008, 07:08 PM
This will prove to be an interesting case. I'm not sure it's a constitutional one, however. Ex-Miz-Whosit can sue for defamation, and the trial judge can penalize Mr. Whosit by assessing "fault" against him (i.e. spousal abuse - mental emotional, etc.), but curtail the man's right to write a "fictional" account of his marriage?? No. If so, how many books do you reckon we need to jerk from publication? All fiction works "based on a true story" ? Wow.

dollfus46
01-10-2008, 07:25 PM
This will prove to be an interesting case. I'm not sure it's a constitutional one, however. Ex-Miz-Whosit can sue for defamation, and the trial judge can penalize Mr. Whosit by assessing "fault" against him (i.e. spousal abuse - mental emotional, etc.), but curtail the man's right to write a "fictional" account of his marriage?? No. If so, how many books do you reckon we need to jerk from publication? All fiction works "based on a true story" ? Wow.

You're just trying to drive me crazy ain'tcha?

SueScribe
01-10-2008, 07:35 PM
You're just trying to drive me crazy ain'tcha?

Oh, no. I wuvs you. :attack: