PDA

View Full Version : Should Jeff Bower Explain


noway
10-11-2005, 11:17 PM
HA Editorial form Saturday October 8th


There have been several disciplinary incidents on the University of Southern Mississippi football team this year.


But in each case, Southern Miss head coach Jeff Bower has either refused to disclose the discipline he imposed on the players or confirm that disciplinary action was related to a specific event.

We believe Bower should make this information public.

By refusing to do so, the head coach encourages the perception that some players are receiving favorable treatment.

In July, Bower disciplined several players following an incident at the Hi-Hat 2000 club in Hattiesburg. Two players were dismissed from the team and two were suspended for a game. (The suspensions were later lifted.) Two others quit the team over the incident.

When asked about the incident, Bower said he wouldn't confirm that the players' departures and suspensions were related to the event in question.

"I've told the players it's family business," said Bower. "I wouldn't comment on that, and I wouldn't expect them to comment on that."

Last month, Southern Miss placekicker Darren McCaleb was disciplined following his arrest Sept. 17 on a domestic abuse charge.

Again, Bower refused to give any details about his disciplinary actions, saying simply: "I'm not going to discuss that. It was addressed and the discipline was pretty serious."

What does "pretty serious" mean?

And are the penalties imposed by the head coach applied equitably to the entire squad?

The answer to these and other questions is, "No one knows, except the coaching staff and the players."

Following his dismissal from the team in the wake of the incident at the Hi-Hat 2000 club, senior Darrell Bennett said: "All I can tell you is I was kicked off the team for basically nothing."

Bower's refusal to be more forthcoming about his disciplinary actions is a cause for concern - and an issue that must be addressed.

Bower works at a publicly funded university, and transparency and accountability should be expected at all times. It's disappointing that the university is not holding Coach Bower to these standards.

noway
10-11-2005, 11:21 PM
letter to the editor

I disagree strongly with your editorial regarding coach Jeff Bower's discipline policy of not identifying team rule violations and related punishments ("Bower needs to explain his actions," Oct. 8). Bower has followed the same policy since he arrived on campus as head coach, only occasionally updating rules and punishments, as needed.



He has the best coaching reputation in the South as a disciplinarian. His players and coaches know he is fair, and his players know they will not be publicly humiliated, as you seem to recommend.

I believe you should retract your editorial and apologize to Bower and the University of Southern Mississippi football team and coaching staff.

Kenneth Hall, Picayune

wilebill
10-11-2005, 11:44 PM
Another letter in the C-L today raises the point that it's now illegal for anyone to give out any info about a student without their permission. I think he's correct in that assessment, although I'm not a lawyer (and glad of it!).

If that is indeed the case, then the HA should apologize to Bower, and they should have known better.

fuzzis
10-12-2005, 07:40 AM
Another letter in the C-L today raises the point that it's now illegal for anyone to give out any info about a student without their permission. I think he's correct in that assessment, although I'm not a lawyer (and glad of it!).

If that is indeed the case, then the HA should apologize to Bower, and they should have known better.

That is correct. FERPA prohibits the disclosure of student records (and discipline is one of those).

http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html

fuzzis

Southern_Belle
10-12-2005, 10:37 AM
I agree. My master's program will place me in student affairs work at colleges and universities. Because of FERPA , which we discussed last week, Bower is not required/allowed to release detail about the punishments and disciplinary actions he inflicts on his players. The only way this would be possible is if the student signs agreeing to the release of the information. This is completely okay for Bower to do! :-)

aaron
10-12-2005, 11:12 AM
I say forget what Bower did to them. These people were arrested on violence charges. What did the police do to them?

fuzzis
10-12-2005, 11:22 AM
That's true.

And while Bower can't discuss what types of disciplinary action is taken against his players, he can set pretty stringent standards. I know that that AD at the school where I got my undergrad instituted a policy that stated if a student athlete was arrested on a felony charge, he was off the team. No questions asked. Something about the integrity and morals of his players were as important...if not more so...than winning games...then again, when he was the AD and not the head coach, we weren't winning many games. ;-)

fuzzis

Conveyor Belt
01-24-2006, 08:45 AM
From my second hand knowledge of the Hi-Hat 2000 situation, I don't have a problem with what the football players did. From my understanding, the local 'gangsters' were pissed at the football players, and started the whole mess. The football players finished it, and got the public blame because they're the public figures.

Privacy, or no privacy, a team is not built on sharing flaws. He is right to not discuss the disipline. I think he talks about it too much. All that needs to be said is "Mr. X won't be playing for the next few games." and then no comment after that.

jojobeans1120
02-21-2006, 10:10 AM
Well my knowledge of having classes at the time with some of the players that were there he punished the wrong ones and the 1 he liked slapped him on the wrist. The whole team was suppose to do what only a few did go into his office and quit that would have been one heck of a season.lol derick again

Tommy9854
03-01-2006, 04:38 PM
From my second hand knowledge of the Hi-Hat 2000 situation, I don't have a problem with what the football players did. From my understanding, the local 'gangsters' were pissed at the football players, and started the whole mess. The football players finished it, and got the public blame because they're the public figures.

Privacy, or no privacy, a team is not built on sharing flaws. He is right to not discuss the disipline. I think he talks about it too much. All that needs to be said is "Mr. X won't be playing for the next few games." and then no comment after that.

The football players put theirselves in that situation by going to an off-limit club