PDA

View Full Version : Why insurance goes up


aaron
02-09-2006, 12:22 PM
Scott Farris just sent this to me in email. I really thought the totally ridiculous lawsuits were over with and was a thing of the 90's, but apparently not.

Subject: Stella Awards

The Stella Awards--or: "Why our insurance costs go up"...

> It's time once again to review the winners of the Annual "Stella Awards."
> The Stella Awards are named after 81 year-old Stella Liebeck who spilled
> hot coffee on herself and successfully sued McDonald's (in NM). That
> case inspired the Stella awards for the most frivolous, ridiculous,
> successful lawsuits in the United States.
>
> Here are this year's winners:
>
> 5th Place (tie): Kathleen Robertson of Austin, Texas, was awarded
> $80,000 by a jury of her peers after breaking her ankle tripping over a
> toddler who was running inside a furniture store. The owners of the
> store were understandably surprised at the verd! ict, considering the
> misbehaving little toddler was Ms. Robertson's son.
>
> 5th Place (tie): 19-year-old Carl Truman of Los Angeles won $74,000 and
> medical expenses when his neighbor ran over his hand with a Honda
> Accord. Mr. Truman apparently didn't notice there was someone at the
> wheel of the car when he was trying to steal his neighbor's hubcaps.
>
> 5th Place (tie): Terrence Dickson of Bristol, Pennsylvania, was leaving
> a house he had just finished robbing by way of the garage. He was not
> able to get the garage door to go up since the automatic door opener was
> malfunctioning. He couldn't re-enter the house beca! use the door
> connecting the house and garage locked when he pulled it shut. The
> family was on vacation, and Mr. Dickson found himself locked in the
> garage for eight days. He subsisted on a case of Pepsi he found, and a
> large bag of dry dog food. He sued the homeowner's insurance claiming
> the situation caused him undue mental anguish. The jury agreed to the
> tune of $500,000.
>
> 4th Place: Jerry Williams of Little Rock, Arkansas, was awarded $14,500
> and medical expenses after being bitten on the buttocks by his next door
> neighbor's beagle. The beagle was on a chain in its owner's fenced yard.
> The award was less than sought because the jury felt the dog might have
> been just a little provoked at the time by Mr. Williams who had climbed
> over the fence into the yard and was shooting it repeatedly with a pellet
> gun.
>
> 3rd Place: A Philadelphia restaurant was ordered to pay Amber Carson of
> Lancaster, Pennsylvania, $113,500 after she slipped on a soft drink and
> broke her coccyx (tailbone). The beverage was on the floor because Ms.
> Carson had thrown it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlie! r during an
> argument.
>
> 2nd Place: Kara Walton of Claymont, Delaware, successfully sued the
> owner of a night club in a neighboring city when she fell from the
> bathroom window to the floor a! nd knocked out her two front teeth.
> This occurred while Ms. Walton was trying to sneak through the window
> in the ladies room to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge. She was
> awarded $12,000 and dental expenses.
>
> 1st Place: This year's run away winner was Mrs. Merv Grazinski of
> OklahomaCity, Oklahoma. Mrs. Grazinski purchased a brand new 32-foot
> Winnebago motor home. On her first trip home, (from an OU football
> game), having driven onto the freeway, she set the cruise control at 70
> mph and calmly left the drivers seat to go into the back & make herself
> a sandwich. Not surprisingly, the RV left the freeway, crashed and
> overturned.
>
> Mrs.Grazinski sued Winnebago for not advising her in the owner's manual
> that she couldn't actually do this. The jury awarded her $1,750,000
> plus a new motor home. The company actually changed their manuals on
> the basis of this suit, just in case there were any other complete
> morons around...

fuzzis
02-09-2006, 12:30 PM
http://www.snopes.com/legal/lawsuits.asp

and for info on the McDonald's lawsuit:

http://lawandhelp.com/q298-2.htm

fuzzis

IGID
02-09-2006, 01:08 PM
OMG! Where do they get their jury from? I think the jury pool should have to take a IQ test in order to be on the jury and make at least 50. Those are ridiculus. Surely, all those will be appealed.

ynotme297
02-09-2006, 02:36 PM
i thought the jury was supposed to made up from your peers. does that mean that the jury has to be as stupid as the person doing the sueing? hmmmmm, makes one wonder.:smt102

lamarrebel
02-09-2006, 03:28 PM
Assuming this is a full and fair rpresentation of what happened, none of these cases should have even made it to the jury. The judges in each of these cases should have granted summary judgment in favor of the respective defendants. These are just examples of why we must never surrender the right of the people to elect judges and why we as voters must do a better job watching their actions in order to make informed decisions come voting time. More attorneys must also summons up the courage and desire of public service to challenge judges who don't follow the law, but their own personal whims.

fuzzis
02-09-2006, 03:31 PM
If you check the first link I posted, NONE of them are true.

Snopes.com is a site dedicated to urban legends...proving or disproving them.

fuzzis

IGID
02-09-2006, 04:11 PM
Thanks Fuzzis. I thought the links were going to be more stories that went on to prove how stupid people can be. I'm glad to know there aren't judges and jury's quite that stupid, close, but not that bad.

fuzzis
02-09-2006, 04:47 PM
The second link details some key facts about the McDonald's case. McDonald's did in fact deserve to pay...and pay dearly...for the woman's injuries. They knew that their product could...and had...cause severe harm but were unwilling to change their policies.

fuzzis

wilebill
02-09-2006, 10:03 PM
Thanks for posting the snopes link, fuzzis. Whenever I read something like that which just seems unbelievable, snopes is the first place I check.

aaron
02-10-2006, 03:27 AM
I think it says something that the story could circulate through the internet and people believe it.

fuzzis
02-10-2006, 10:03 AM
I think it says something that the story could circulate through the internet and people believe it.

I just got a forward for one of those send-this-email-and-get-a-check-from-Microsoft a couple of days ago. If it comes from a friend, even if there is an air of unbelievability to the situation, we're likely to trust it.

fuzzis

IGID
02-10-2006, 12:59 PM
Does anybody know anybody that has received their check from Microsoft yet? I'm still checking my mail for mine.....jk